Thread: Need advice
View Single Post
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 3rd December 2004, 11:00
krymyhier krymyhier is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 10
‘A’-’a’-wareness

Jaybang…

Maybe we have different ideas to what ‘A’-’a’-wareness relates to.

Simply put what I am saying is that someone who is not aware of his own existence would not be clouded by his own personal subjective ideas. When one can not be subjective you can only be objective, therefore the experiences of such an entity is the only experiences that truly describes the universe as it is.

We think that awareness relates to knowing that I exist. Does it ?
Can we really know anything while our interpretations are clouded by our own definitions of the truth.

I speak of the self(awareness) and the Self(Awareness)

The Self with a capital ‘S’ relates to the part in our consciousness which ties to the pure objective experience – some relate to this as super-consciousness, or as C.G Jung said – the collective consciousness. It is pure, accurate and objective. It is the seat of knowledge. The word ‘I’ does not exist in this context because the Self binds everything together as a singular entity. All that exist is the Self. The Self merely exist. It need not prove anything to ItSelf in order to give value to ItSelf. It simply is.
‘A’wareness is a state of being, a knowing that in the infinite everything is a possibility. With ‘A’wareness there will be different opinions but it would be known that each opinion is only a finite idea that is entertained until a new finite idea replaces it. Opinions does not define the truth but they are part of the truth.
With the Self politics is dead.

The self with a lowercase ‘s’ relates to our personal interpretation of our experiences.
We use each experience in life, interpret it against a stored reference (which we call memory), we decide that this experience was a good(enjoyable)experience with possible good(enjoyable) repercussions OR we decide that this was a bad(evil, un-enjoyable) experience with possible bad(evil, un-enjoyable) repercussions.
This self defines itself as something separate. The self perceives that it exists separately and it does not fully realize that every action it takes influence the entire universe. Therefore this self is by nature selfish because it will have as an objective the primary goal to preserve itself. It has to measure itself to everything else to give value to itself. The self needs to define itself separately.
Then ‘a’wareness is the ability to experience, to interpret, and to define the truth. With ‘a’wareness there will be different opinions and people will believe that certain opinions hold more truth than others, there will be conflict.
With the self politics is alive.


Maybe this shed some light on how I perceive things to be.
But then – Do I have the ability to know things for what they are ?
This is an idea.
That is all that it is.
It does not hold truth – It can not.
It exists in truth therefore if you disagree – I agree to disagree.

We are part of something which has more common ground than differences.



Reply With Quote