Can you provide any hard evidence that the SA courts are not impartial? Or hard evidence that the US courts are impartial? There was no claim of misconduct on any side in the Zuma rape trial. The fact that the man is an embarrassment and a buffoon and in my opinion not fit to run the ANC or our country does not make him a rapist. His corruption trial will go ahead, and hopefully the prosecution will have their ducks in a row and he will be found guilty - seeing as his adviser is already in jail for having a corrupt relationship with him, it seems natural that the other half of the corrupt relationship should also be guilty.
Zuma's knowledge of HIV is dangerous and that alone in my opinion rules unfit to run the country. I despair at the false hope of the people who elected him head of the ANC and at how he has misled them - at home he was espousing socialist policies while abroad he was assuring investors that SA would stay on Mbeki's capitalist path.
